Digital download · one-time $29 · no subscription

AI Prompt Toolkit for Teachers

Copy a prompt, fill in the brackets, and get an AI-generated first draft of lesson plans, rubrics, feedback comments, family emails and classroom materials, for you to review and edit. Student privacy and your school's AI policy come first, from page one.

This toolkit contains lesson-planning and communication templates and AI prompts for teachers. It is not legal, special-education, medical or professional advice. AI output can be wrong or biased; review everything before it reaches students or parents. Follow your school or district's AI, privacy and curriculum policies.

Before you paste anything: use no real student names, grades, IEP/504 details or photos in AI tools unless your school has approved that tool and signed a data agreement (FERPA, COPPA and state student-privacy laws may apply). Do not upload student work or photos to a free personal AI account. Follow your school or district AI policy. All students in this toolkit are fictional.

Buy the toolkit for $29
Sold to buyers in the United States only. Written for teachers; students should not use these prompts.

Who it is for

K-12 and college teachers who are allowed to use AI tools and want practical prompts they can use today, not a course to sit through. Works with Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini.

What is inside

29 prompts in 6 groups. Every prompt has a plain-language "when to use", fill-in brackets, a worked example on made-up sample data with the output from one run, and a "check before using" line.

Plus a short opening section on following your school or district AI policy, keeping real student names, grades, IEP/504 details and photos out of AI tools (FERPA, COPPA and state law may apply), and academic integrity, and a one-page start-here workflow. Delivered as a printable web page and a Markdown file.

Three free sample prompts

The examples use made-up sample data. Each output is from one run of the prompt; yours will differ.

A1. Lesson plan skeleton with timings

When to use: You know the topic and objective and need a timed first draft to edit.

Prompt

AI-generated draft: review before you use.

Act as an experienced [GRADE / COURSE] teacher. Draft a [MINUTES]-minute lesson on [TOPIC].
Objective (my words): [OBJECTIVE]
Students: [CLASS SIZE, anything general that matters, e.g. "mixed readiness", "many English learners"]
Include, as a table with timings: a hook (5 minutes or less), direct instruction, guided practice, independent practice, and a 3-question exit ticket. Then list the 2 misconceptions students most often have on this topic and one move to address each.
Do not invent standard codes or cite sources.
Worked example (sample data, not real people)

Sample data: Grade 7 math, 45 minutes, adding and subtracting integers. Objective: students add and subtract integers with a number line and explain why subtracting a negative increases the value. Class of 28, mixed readiness.

Output from one run of the prompt

AI-generated draft: review before you use.

| Time | Segment | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| 0-5 | Hook | Show "It is -3 degrees at 6 a.m. and the temperature rises 8 degrees." Students answer on whiteboards, then explain how they moved on a thermometer. |
| 5-15 | Direct instruction | Model addition on a number line (right for positive, left for negative). Introduce "subtracting means adding the opposite" with 4 - (-3) = 4 + 3. Two think-aloud examples. |
| 15-25 | Guided practice | Pairs solve 6 problems; one partner draws the number line, the other writes the rule used. Swap after 3. |
| 25-38 | Independent practice | 10 problems: 4 addition, 4 subtraction, 2 word problems (elevation, bank balance). |
| 38-43 | Exit ticket | (1) -5 + 9  (2) 3 - (-6)  (3) In one sentence, why does subtracting a negative make a number larger? |
| 43-45 | Close | Collect tickets, preview tomorrow. |

Misconception 1: students read 4 - (-3) as 4 - 3 because they drop the second sign. Move: always rewrite as "add the opposite" before computing.
Misconception 2: "two negatives always make a positive", applied to -2 + -3. Move: put both on the number line and compare the direction of each move.

Check before using: Check the pacing is realistic for your class and that the practice problems are actually solvable and correct; no standard codes were requested, so match the objective to your own standards yourself.

C1. Analytic rubric builder

When to use: You need a 4-level rubric fast.

Prompt

AI-generated draft: review before you use.

Create an analytic rubric for [ASSIGNMENT] in [GRADE / COURSE]. Criteria (use these, add none): [LIST 3-5 CRITERIA]. 4 levels: [LEVEL NAMES, e.g. Exceeding, Meeting, Approaching, Beginning]. Describe each cell in observable terms (what a reader could point to), not vague words like "good" or "excellent". Format as a table. Total points: [POINTS].
Worked example (sample data, not real people)

Sample data: Grade 8 science lab report. Criteria: Hypothesis, Procedure, Data and graph, Conclusion. Levels: 4,3,2,1. Total points: 16.

Output from one run of the prompt

AI-generated draft: review before you use.

| Criterion | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | Testable "if...then...because" statement tied to the question | Testable statement, reasoning missing or weak | Statement is a prediction only, not testable | Missing or unrelated to the question |
| Procedure | Numbered steps another person could repeat; variables named | Steps repeatable with one gap | Steps listed with several gaps | Not a procedure |
| Data and graph | Accurate table; graph with title, labeled axes, units | Minor error in table or graph labels | Table or graph missing a main element | No usable data |
| Conclusion | States whether data support the hypothesis, cites 2 data points, names one source of error | Cites 1 data point or no source of error | States a result without data | No conclusion |

Check before using: Check each cell describes something you can actually see in a student's work, and adjust the points to your grade book.

D1. Concern email, calm and specific

When to use: You need to raise a concern without blame.

Prompt

AI-generated draft: review before you use.

Draft an email from a [GRADE] teacher to a family about a concern. Use [CHILD] for the student's first name. Concern in general terms: [WHAT YOU HAVE OBSERVED, as facts with dates, e.g. "3 missing assignments in the last 2 weeks"]. Strengths to open with: [1-2 REAL STRENGTHS]. What I will do: [YOUR ACTIONS]. What I am asking the family: [ONE SMALL ASK]. Tone: respectful, plain, under 150 words. Do not diagnose, label, or predict outcomes. Offer a time to talk.
Worked example (sample data, not real people)

Sample data: Grade 7; 3 missing assignments in 2 weeks; strengths: contributes in class discussions, helps classmates; I will: send a checklist and offer lunch help; ask: check the planner nightly.

Output from one run of the prompt

AI-generated draft: review before you use.

Subject: Checking in about [CHILD]'s assignments

Hello,

[CHILD] has been a thoughtful voice in class discussions and often helps classmates. I wanted to let you know that three assignments have not been turned in during the last two weeks. I will send home a weekly checklist and I am available at lunch on Tuesdays and Thursdays for extra help. It would help if you could look at [CHILD]'s planner together each evening. If a phone call is easier, I am free after school on Wednesday. Thank you for working on this together.

[YOUR NAME]

Check before using: Check every fact against your own records and make sure nothing sounds like a conclusion about the child or the family.

Price and refund

$29, one time. If it is not useful, email [email protected] within 30 days of purchase and we refund you.

This toolkit contains lesson-planning and communication templates and AI prompts for teachers. It is not legal, special-education, medical or professional advice. AI output can be wrong or biased; review everything before it reaches students or parents. Follow your school or district's AI, privacy and curriculum policies.

Before you paste anything: use no real student names, grades, IEP/504 details or photos in AI tools unless your school has approved that tool and signed a data agreement (FERPA, COPPA and state student-privacy laws may apply). Follow your school or district AI policy. All students in this toolkit are fictional.

Buy the toolkit for $29
Sold to buyers in the United States only. Written for teachers; students should not use these prompts.

Questions

Which AI tools does it work with?

Any chat-style assistant, including Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini. Use one your school or district allows.

Is there a subscription?

No. It is one payment of $29 and the files are yours to keep.

What format is it?

A print-friendly web page (toolkit.html) and a Markdown text file you can copy from. No videos and no login.

What is it not?

It is not legal, educational or professional advice, not a replacement for your school's AI policy, and not a promise of any result. It does not grade student work; it has templates only, and legal compliance with an IEP or 504 plan is the school's. It tells you never to paste real student names, grades, IEP/504 details or photos into an AI tool unless your school has approved that tool and signed a data agreement.

Will it work if my school restricts AI?

Some prompts only need your own plans and notes, with no student information. Follow your school's rules; the toolkit's first section shows what to check.

Who wrote it?

Written with AI. Each example was generated once on made-up sample data; no teacher or other professional has reviewed this toolkit.